So far rehearsals are going as I have expected them to, that does not necessarily mean "well".
i find it deeply frustrating that the geisha are taking extremely long to learn their dance and how their lack of effort and commitment (some at least) is hindering their performance.
i think constant repetition of actions in the dance will help them learn it and it will further engrave in their brains that it's not about whether they want to do anything or not, it's about the play and it being successful. I read in Marowitz' book that a director must have a balance between someone who is firm and gives orders and someone who takes suggestions to make the performance better, however, what if when I take suggestions and agree with them the end product is still the same? (no effort, bad product) or when i'm firm and tell them to work i still get nothing? How does one deal with something like this? because usually, the books and information given by actual directors is mostly about their work with professional or at least experienced actors NOT with 6th grade and above.
roberto came up with the idea to have the geisha along with the ninjas come every rehearsal so that they learn their parts alone. I think this could be effective because they will somehow become bored with not doing anything (what they would do in the first half hour i think) and actually get some work done, maybe they feel intimidated by anyone else's presence (anyone in charge that is) so we'll give this a try.
This week start the actual rehearsals, what i mean by this is the rehearsals of scenes. I think the last one i had was quite successful but i have come to the realization that the actual arrangement of the scene (particularly the ones in the palace) is kind of restraining. I found myself thinking about things the royal family could do, around the stage or even stand somewhere but this would not be possible because they are fixed in the platform, moving them would ruin the aesthetics of the scene so i think yes, this does restrain but isn't that what we want? restrain then earthquake? so i will have people there move only when an earthquake or very important and tense action happens in the scene.
with this last thing i realize that things that restrain us can actually turn to our benefit, so i begin to wonder about the so called "no-nos" of theatre, what is wrong? because say, turning your back on the audience is something that is wrong in western forms of theatre but it could work in other traiditions an places. so
what exactly do we mean and what exactly is, in theatre, wrong?
WRONG is...
ResponderEliminar... when a director doesn't know what he wants and the things he allows on stage don't have coherence, because he doesn't go prepared to rehearsals and improvises when he's there.
Roberto
i understand this is in terms of directing, however what i meant is in terms of conventions and how they could be misinterpreted or poorly received within different communities and cultures. could you comment about that?
ResponderEliminarmauriciooo
1. a play, because of the nature of theatre, is not directed to different communities and cultures but generally to only one (unless you have a very intercultural audience, which is not our case)
ResponderEliminar2. the play has to contain in itself the rules that make the audience be able to play the game that it proposes
how to do that? by having a clear concept at the beginning and then as you make the play by taking distance from it, by looking at it like the audience would, and by looking at the whole thing and not wasting too much time in the details
as you make the play your own game is to find how it will show the audience the "rules" by which to play. generally, the beginning of a play sets the guidelines
roberto